By Ricci , May 14, in Bass Gear. This is an oldie but a goody. It's an expensive bugger like most of the woofers I test these days but it is still a cut above most of the 18" units on the market. I always wanted to test one of these just to see how good it is. I don't expect many people to go out and buy these for a project at those prices but it is still a common driver to see in the industry in a lot of JBL's top Pro subs.

Author:Arashishakar Tom
Language:English (Spanish)
Published (Last):21 April 2015
PDF File Size:13.42 Mb
ePub File Size:7.57 Mb
Price:Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]

Remember Me? Page 1 of 2 1 2 Last Jump to page: Results 1 to 15 of Thread: WH vs H. WH vs H I know this is probably a ridiculous question, but which driver do you think is better suited for a large, dedicated home theater space with accuracy and uncolored sound reproduction as top priority? Desired output will be achieved by adding however many number of subs are needed. Also considering the 's since I hear they are a better value over the SUB What is the peak to peak excursion of the WH driver?

I know the has a 3. I know physics dictate that the S1S-EX should be the superior sub being more efficient, having greater output capability etc, but from those that heard both, which do you prefer and why?

I notice the FR graph for the S2S-EX seems more linear until about 25hz where it gradually starts to roll off, whereas the S1S-EX seems to be on a gradual downward slope from 80hz down. It's down almost 15db at 20hz from 80hz. Originally Posted by baldrick. Thanks for the info. I was toying with the idea of the mammoth since it's a better value than the SUB Originally Posted by Blackdevil Originally Posted by hlaari.

Have you used H? WH is great and If you use several IT will probably be an excellent choise for HT use, but that is also the other drivers. Keep in mind that the H has the same type of motor as the M2. The WH is an older type design, with large ferrite magnet. I'm sure they're both great subs. But at those prices I'd want the latest-greatest tech. Originally Posted by DS I disagree First, H is aprox 10 years? And what about i. E2 and K2 speakers, they use "similar" technology as WH and not like h.

So I mean that this is not something one should consider important at all, and both are very good. I thought H was great but I would imagine that WH will dig a bit deeper than h and sound at least equally good, probably even better, but H will play louder and give more "cinema like" bass.

Page 1 of 2 1 2 Last Jump to page:. Replies: 9 Last Post: , PM. JBL h By Dr. Replies: 2 Last Post: , PM. Replies: 0 Last Post: , AM. Replies: 1 Last Post: , PM. All times are GMT The time now is AM.

All rights reserved. Extra Tabs by vBulletin Hispano.


JBL 2269h 18″ 2400w RMS Neo Woofer 354096-001x 8 Ohm Low Frequency Transducer



JBL 2269H 18″ Low Frequency Transducer 354096-001X




Related Articles